Like all of the best inventions, Peter Durand managed to create a device which not only helped to assist with shipment, but which was also of benefit to humanity as a whole. Durand’s creation? The humble tin can.

- Source: Wikipedia
Little is known of Durand’s early life, but by 1810 he had become a successful merchant, working from Hoxton Square near London. As a food trader, Durand knew only too well that his goods had a limited life span and would perish quickly. Using a technique he learned from the French inventor Phillipe de Girard, Peter Durand approached the then king, George III and was granted a patent for preserving food using sealable containers. Most importantly the patent covered the use of tin cans for preserving food.
Durand successfully tested his new method of preservation using tin cans by deploying a number of items for use by the Royal Navy. Six months after the food was shipped, scientists from the Royal Society opened the tins and found that the food was perfectly safe to eat.
The Royal Navy found that preserved food was only one of the benefits of the new tin cans. Firstly, tin cans were robust and easy to store; previously food had had to be stored in large wooden barrels which were bulky and space inefficient. Secondly, food which could be stored for at least six months meant that voyages could be extended, reducing the need to make landfall to secure supplies.
Despite the success of the tin can, Peter Durand chose not to take the invention any further himself and sold the patent just two years after it was granted. The new owners of the patent turned the idea into a commercial success and the storage of food was changed for ever.
Durand’s story did not end there though. In 1818 Peter Durand managed to secure the US patent for his tinned food invention and so began the globalisation of the humble tin can.
Posted on
February 21, 2012 in
Supply Chain, Supply Chain Management
by
Tagged as
Comments Off




Just one year later, in a supermarket in Ohio, USA, the first ever commercial transaction using Woodland’s new barcoding system took place. So momentous was the occasion that the receipt generated by the transaction is still on display today at the Smithsonian Institute.
Because every aspect of The Berlin Airlift had to be performed at the fastest possible speed, logistics officers, led by US Army Master Sergeant Edward A Guilbert, had to develop a way of tracking all of the cargo arriving in the city. Upon commencement of the Airlift, it rapidly became apparent that the different manifest forms accompanying each delivery were totally different, some even in other languages. Clearly something had to be done to standardise the process.
These new shipping containers also allowed for accurate shipping cost calculations, cargo load balancing, and better protection of customer goods from general pilfering by dock handlers. However, the major coup of Tantlinger’s containers was the massive reduction in shipping costs that all of these innovations allowed. Shipping of goods is now a tiny part of the overall production cost, and it is almost the same price to transport goods from anywhere in the World to anywhere else. No longer are shipping costs calculated in terms of geographical distances between points (as was the case in McLean’s original haulage model). Instead they are now calculated on weight. As a result, it costs roughly the same to ship 1 tonne of goods between Holland and Harwich as it does to ship from Beijing to Birmingham.