Many providers and even some governments have been touting PDF versions of invoices as a genuine form of electronic invoicing. Whilst PDF attachments sent via email are certainly electronic, many of the benefits available through automated e-Invoicing systems are lost.
A study published by AIIM (http://www.aiim.org/Research/Industry-Watch/Paper-Free-Capture-2012) reveals that PDF file attachments are in fact costing more than they are saving. How is this possible? Consider the following findings:
When receiving a PDF copy of an invoice, more than 75% of recipients immediately print a hard copy.
- Of these persons who print invoices, 16% then re-scan the documents so that they can be sent on as email attachments.
- 10% of those who receive PDF invoices print two or more copies.
- Another 10% do the manual processing of PDF invoices on-screen, yet still print a copy for archiving.
It is clear therefore that for the majority of people receiving standard PDF versions of invoices are not really gaining anything from the process. The PDF invoice requires manual entry into the recipient’s own accounts system, duplicating effort and immediately reducing time savings over a printed copy to zero.

By the same token, if 75% or more of PDF invoices are printed, the recipient again fails to benefit from the paperless-system by absorbing the cost of creating a hardcopy themselves. Perhaps the most unfathomable result of the AIIM survey is the finding that 16% of people print out PDF files so that they can rescan them into a new PDF file – this not only makes no sense, but is doubly costly in terms of time spent.
True electronic invoicing, such as that provided by Celtrino’s Smart Admin platform, de-duplicates manual entry and removes the need for printing invoices creating savings for both sender and recipient. This cannot be said of a standard PDF attachment.
Posted on
April 26, 2012 in
Celtrino Platform, e-Invoicing, Smart Admin
by
Tagged as
Comments Off






Celtrino
Declan
John
Justyna
Ken
Patrick